London Borough of Croydon (22 010 511)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging Mr X for an enforcement agent visit which he disputes took place. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about being charged for a visit by enforcement agents in November 2021. He says that he does not believe the visit was made and he refuses to pay the charge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X received a charge of £235 on his council tax account following a claim that enforcement agents employed by the Council visited his home following the issue of a liability order from the Magistrates Court and an enforcement notice from the agents.
  2. Mr X says he does not believe the visit took place and asked for evidence that the charge was justified. The Council sent him a GPS tracking record provided by the agents and a copy of a letter left at his address which Mr X denies receiving.
  3. The Council says it is satisfied that the charge for the visit is valid and it requires Mr X to pay the outstanding balance.
  4. Without credible evidence that the visit could not have take place we cannot resolve the dispute raised by the complainant. Not all complaints received by us are accepted for investigation. The legislation gives us discretion as to whether a complaint should be pursued and, in reaching that decision, a preliminary assessment is made. We have to take account of the degree of injustice sustained and whether there is any realistic chance of achieving a satisfactory outcome. In this case the latter is unlikely and we will not consider it further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging Mr X for an enforcement agent visit which he disputes took place. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings