London Borough of Ealing (19 016 579)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Feb 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The complaint is about the Council asking Mr B to pay business rates and court costs. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because the Council is no longer asking Mr B to pay anything. Further investigation would not achieve anything significant.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complained the Council asked him to pay business rates before granting him rates relief and also asked him to pay court costs. He considered it unjustified that he would have to pay court costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mr B provided and a response the Council sent us. I gave Mr B the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr B states the Council demanded business rates that he did not believe he owed. He then obtained business rates relief so the Council no longer sought payment of the rates. When Mr B complained to us, the Council was asking him to pay £147.50 court costs. The Council has now withdrawn the court costs as a goodwill gesture.
  2. As the Council is no longer seeking any payment, I do not consider the events complained of cause Mr B any continuing injustice that is significant enough for the Ombudsman to pursue. We could not achieve significantly more by investigating the complaint.
  3. Mr B also said he wanted a Council officer to be removed but that is not something the Ombudsman can achieve.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint is effectively resolved.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings