London Borough of Havering (19 000 335)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 May 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to remove her business rate relief. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because the matter is out of time and the decision regarding rating was made by the Valuation Office Agency which is not within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to remove her business rate relief.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as the Valuation Office Agency. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  4. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on business rates.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the complainant's comments and the Council's comments and Mrs X has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X ran a business which attracted business rate relief. However, in 2015, the Council wrote to her to say that the Valuation Office Agency had decided that she was also using a separate property and this should be chargeable for business rates. This meant that she would lose the business rate relief she had been entitled to as the relief was limited to one property.
  2. Mrs X appealed to the Valuation Office Agency but her appeal was rejected. Mrs X had a further right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal on this matter.
  3. The ultimate decision as to whether Mrs X was liable for business rates for the second property lay with the Valuation Office Agency subject to appeal to a Valuation Tribunal. This is not therefore a matter for the Ombudsman.
  4. Further, I see no reason why a complaint could not have been made to this office in 2015 when Mrs X first became aware of the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because this was a matter for the Valuation Office Agency and is out of time.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings