London Borough of Barnet (18 019 840)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 May 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs X complains that the Council is holding her organisation liable for business rates for a building which they have had to leave due to the failings of the landlord. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because this is a matter for the courts.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains that the Council is holding her organisation liable for business rates for a building which they have had to leave due to the failings of the landlord.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the complainant's comments and the Council's comments and Mrs X has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X represents a church organisation; a charity which has rented premises for a number of years. However, as a result of alleged failings of the landlord, the Centre has had to cancel its lease with the landlord and leave the premises in June 2018.
  2. She says that, nevertheless, the Council is still charging the church business rates for the property.
  3. The Council says that the lease dispute is a private matter between the church and the landlord. It adds that insufficient information has been provided to enable the Council to alter its decision that business rates were still payable by the church after June 2018.
  4. The Ombudsman considers that only a court can determine whether there is a liability for business rates. Mrs X could have argued her case when the matter was considered by the court in 2019.
  5. Mrs X also argues that the church should have been entitled to rate relief as it is a registered charity. That information is available on the Council’s website and it is for the liable person to make that application. We do not consider it fault by the Council that Mrs X did not apply for rate relief.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because this is a matter for the court.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings