Waverley Borough Council (25 016 296)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a housing benefit overpayment. This is because the complaint is late. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s recent actions.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council’s housing benefit overpayment decision in 2015 was wrong, and it should not continue to recover it. She says the Council did not advise her how she could appeal and it has not taken account of her medical condition and the hardship it has caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council regarding the matters in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied it had advised her of the right of appeal in 2015. As she had not appealed it had recovered the overpayment by making deductions from her housing benefit. It had then sent her an invoice for the remaining overpayment. It noted Ms X’s circumstances were difficult. It advised Ms X to contact its overpayment recovery team to discuss affordable repayments.
  3. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council overpayment decision in 2015. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for this.
  4. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation into the Council’s more recent actions in 2025. The Council has explained the reasons for its continuing recovery of the overpayment. It has advised Ms X to contact its recovery team to discuss an affordable arrangement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons for this. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s recent actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings