Buckinghamshire Council (23 019 337)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to write off a Council tax debt as the matter could be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council refused to write off a previous Council tax debt despite her previous successful appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X had appealed to a Valuation Tribunal against a decision to recover Council tax from her. Her appeal was successful and the tribunal decided that the overpayment could not be recovered. However, the Council sought to recover a previous sum from her. The Council wrote off part of that sum using its discretion but no further amount has been written off.
  2. Ms X was advised by the Ombudsman previously that Ms X could appeal against the Council’s refusal to exercise its discretion to write off the whole sum to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent, expert body whose decisions are binding on the Council. I therefore consider that it would be reasonable to pursue an appeal in this case.
  3. I appreciate that this whole matter has been frustrating for Ms X but the Ombudsman would not investigate this aspect because the injustice is insufficient to warrant investigation given that the primary matter is out of jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings