London Borough of Southwark (23 000 190)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council claiming Mrs X owed it £15.95. There is not enough injustice to Mrs X.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council wrongly deducted £15.95 from her housing benefit account after saying she did not owe the amount. She says this caused her stress and she incurred travel and legal costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council at first told Mrs X it had overpaid her housing benefit by £610.60, which she should repay. Mrs X challenged the Council. The Council says it then reduced the overpayment to £15.95. Mrs X disputes that, citing a letter from the Council saying her balance had been reduced to nil.
  2. The central substantive dispute is about only £15.95. That does not amount to enough injustice to Mrs X to justify the Ombudsman investigating. Mrs X says the matter has also caused to incur travel and legal advice costs and she has suffered stress. It was Mrs X’s choice how much effort and expense to devote to a dispute about £15.95. While I appreciate there has been some impact on Mrs X, in all the circumstances it would be disproportionate for the Ombudsman to devote time and public money to investigating whether the Council was at fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough injustice to Mrs X and it would be disproportionate to pursue a complaint where the main dispute is about £15.95.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings