Bristol City Council (21 014 375)
Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 02 Feb 2022
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about appealing a housing benefit overpayment which was created in 2018. Ms X appealed against the decision to the First-Tier Tribunal, and it gave its binding decision in 2019.
The complaint
- Ms X complained about the Council recovering an overpayment of housing benefit from 2018. She says the Council has acted unlawfully.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Ms X received notification of housing benefit and council tax overpayments related to a previous council tenancy which she says she had to abandon due to threats of violence. The Council notified her in October 2018 and she appealed against the overpayment decisions.
- She appealed the council tax reduction overpayment to the Valuation Tribunal and the housing benefit overpayment to the First-Tier Tribunal of the Social Entitlement Chamber. Whilst the Valuation Tribunal removed much of the outstanding amount, the First-Tier Tribunal did not uphold her appeal. Ms X made an appeal against the Tribunal’s decision, but this was rejected by HM Courts and Tribunals Service in December 2019.
- We cannot investigate complaints about housing benefit decisions which have been subject to a decision by an independent tribunal. The First-Tier Tribunal’s decision was binding on Ms X and the Council and we cannot determine whether the original decision was unlawful as she requested. Only the courts can determine points of law about the implementation of statutes.
- Ms X says the overpayments arose from the Council’s failures in dealing with her homeless application and allocation of temporary accommodation against her interests. She submitted a complaint about this to us in 2018 and did not pursue the matter further when we advised her it was premature for our consideration.
Final decision
- We will not investigate this complaint about appealing a housing benefit overpayment which was created in 2018. Ms X appealed against the decision to the First-Tier Tribunal, and it gave its binding decision in 2019.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman