Hastings Borough Council (22 010 913)

Category : Benefits and tax > COVID-19

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse her COVID grant application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a COVID-19 Omicron leisure and tourism grant.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council refused Ms X’s application on the basis the evidence she provided did not show her company was eligible for the grant. Ms X disputes this decision.
  2. The Council’s final response quotes from government guidance which states:

“22. Businesses will only be eligible where their main service falls within hospitality, leisure or accommodation. If a business operates services that could be considered hospitality or leisure, and also fall into another category, the main service can be determined by assessing which category constitutes 50% or more of their overall income. The main service principle will determine whether a business receives funding..”

  1. While Ms X considers the Council failed to take into account in-person services provided by her company this is not the case. The Council has acknowledged these services but explained the evidence she provided did not show they accounted for more than 50% of the company’s income. The decision is a matter of professional judgement and I have seen no evidence of fault in the way it was reached. We cannot therefore question it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings