Brighton & Hove City Council (25 026 968)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a claim for a council tax exemption. It was reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to properly consider his council tax exemption claim. He said his mother’s flat was part of his home and she was a dependent relative and therefore should be exempt. Mr X says the Council relied on inference rather than evidence. He says the Council advised him to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal when this was not a route that was available to him. The Council then refused to consider his complaint about the matter. He says the Council also failed to consider using its discretion

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended).
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council regarding the matters in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied that it considered Mr X’s mother’s flat did not form part of a single property, but was a single property capable of being disposed of in its own right and without breach of any planning consents. It was listed separately for council tax. The Council explained how Mr X could appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he disagreed with the Council’s decision.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because it was reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal regarding the Council’s decision not to award an exemption. Mr X disputes the Council’s decision including its consideration of evidence. This is a matter for the Valuation Tribunal to consider as it would consider the evidence and the Council’s consideration of it. As the Council clearly disagreed with Mr X there was no reason for it to consider its discretion.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because it was reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings