Folkestone & Hythe District Council (25 022 114)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s requirement that Mr X apply for council tax reduction. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council will not award him discretionary tax relief and is requiring him to first apply for council tax reduction. He also complained the Council has demonstrated bias towards him and failed to show empathy for his vulnerability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council will not award him discretionary tax relief without first requiring him to apply for council tax reduction. He also said a council employee told him he would not get council tax reduction if he applied for it and this caused him to feel the Council is biased against him and has not considered his vulnerabilities.
  2. The Council advised it would not award discretionary tax relief if Mr X did not first take steps to maximise his income, which included applying for any financial assistance he could be entitled to. The Council cited its policy in support of this position and outlined information it has previously provided Mr X to support him.
  3. Mr X remains unhappy with the Council’s actions. The Ombudsman cannot fault the Council for following its policy and requiring Mr X to apply for council tax reduction if he is experiencing financial hardship before offering discretionary tax relief. There is no evidence the Council is biased towards Mr X nor that it has failed to consider his personal circumstances. An investigation into this matter would not be likely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings