Birmingham City Council (25 014 702)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal. Further, the alleged fault in the Council’s communication with Mr X has been remedied.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says that the Council has failed to provide detailed responses to his complaints and he disputes his liability for Council tax on a property which he says he no longer owns.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X disputes his Council tax on a property he says he no longer owns.
  2. Any dispute about Council tax liability can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.
  3. Mr X says that the Council failed to provide all legal details relating to the Council’s communications. The Council says that they are not required to provide the legal basis of all Council tax decisions in their communications.
  4. Nevertheless, I note that the Council cancelled a Liability Order obtained as part of the complaint process. The Ombudsman would consider this to be a satisfactory remedy to this part of his complaint and so will not be pursued.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal and part of the complaint has been remedied.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings