Worcester City Council (25 013 299)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X complaint about the name used on a liability order. We do not have the power to investigate matters which have been considered in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council obtained a liability order using his middle name instead of his first name. Mr X also complains of poor complaint handling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended).
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about data protection. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So, where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council applied to court for a liability order for council tax debts on Mr X’s council tax account. The Council applied using Mr X’s middle and last name, not his first and last name.
  2. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the wrong name being used for the liability order. The order was issued by the court, so we do not have the power to consider this complaint.
  3. Mr X also complains the Council held incorrect data about him. The Information Commissioner’s Office is the organisation best placed to consider complaints about how organisations handle people’s data and respond to requests for information. It would be reasonable for Mr X to contact the Information Commissioner’s Office if he would like to complain about how his data was handled.
  4. Finally, we will not investigate how the Council dealt with Mr X’s complaint as it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint handling when we are not looking at the substantive issues.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint. We do not have the power to investigate matters which have been considered in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings