Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Council (25 011 620)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax enforcement as this is a matter for the courts. Further, there is insufficient evidence of injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council has not properly served her either reminder or final notices on her Council tax account to warrant a Liability Order.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that the Council failed to send her any reminder letters concerning her Council tax account. The Council says that the required reminders have been sent.
  2. Any dispute as whether a summons for a Liability Order has been properly carried out can be disputed in court to deny the Liability Order. Further, as no summons had been issued, no additional costs would have been added. In the absence of any costs I do not consider that there is sufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because this is a matter for the courts and there is insufficient evidence of injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings