South Holland District Council (25 002 367)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a council tax second home premium. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to respond to his query about a second home premium and his request for it to be removed as he was selling it. He said this caused him frustration and financial strain.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In March 2025 Mr X contacted the Council about a second home he owned. He said the Council had not sent him the notice required before charging a second home premium from April 2025. He said he was selling the property.
  2. In April 2025 Mr X complained he had received no reply and then, in May 2025, he complained to the Ombudsman.
  3. In June 2025 the Council responded to Mr X. It apologised for its delay and stated it had sent second home owners, including Mr X, a notice in December 2024. It accepted Mr X was selling and removed the premium from April 2025.
  4. An investigation is not justified here because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s handling of Mr X’s second home council tax premium. While there was some delay in responding to Mr X’s complaint, we will not investigate complaint handling where we are not investigating the core matters giving rise to the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings