Westmorland and Furness Council (25 001 838)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about applying a Council tax second home premium. This is because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal, and it would be reasonable for Mr X to use this right of appeal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council has incorrectly imposed a Council tax second home premium. He also said the Council did not properly communicate with him over this matter. Mr X said the Council’s actions caused him distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that the Council has incorrectly applied a Council tax second home premium, and that the Council did not initially respond to his complaint about their decision.
  2. We cannot determine whether an entitlement to a discount or exemption should apply; only a Valuation Tribunal can do this.
  3. Any dispute about liability, discounts or exemptions from Council tax are therefore a matter for the Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.
  4. We will not investigate the Council’s delays, which was part of Mr X’s complaint because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about how the Council communicated about this matter where we decide not to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal, and it would be reasonable to expect him to use this right.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings