Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (24 021 958)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how a Council dealt with overpaid Council Tax. It is unlikely we would find fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council should have paid overpaid Council Tax to him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X which includes the Council’s reply to him.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X separated from his partner, moving out of the family home. The Council Tax account closed which had been in joint names and his expartner opened a new one. The Council transferred the Council Tax which had been overpaid to the new account. Mr X says the Council should have split the amount in half and paid him half. The Council says the payments had been made from a joint bank account and not half from Mr X’s own account.
  2. The Local Government Finance Act 1992 section 6(4) says joint freeholders, leaseholders, tenants, licensees, squatters and owners – are jointly and severally liable. Married couples are also jointly and severally liable. This means each of them are each responsible for paying the whole charge. There is no "my half and their half" – if one leaves and the joint bill is unpaid a council can pursue either of them for the remaining debt.
  3. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings