Birmingham City Council (24 005 382)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the Council charging her full council tax even though the Council does not maintain the road where she lives. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B lives on a private road which has not been adopted by the Council.
  2. Mrs B complains the Council should not be charging her full council tax because the Council does not maintain the road. Mrs B also complains the Council has not answered her query about how she can ask the Council to adopt the road.
  3. Mrs B says the Council should either reduce her council tax or adopt the road and maintain the area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B and asked the Council to respond to Mrs B’s query about adopting the road.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The amount of council tax a person pays is based on the valuation band of their home. Certain discounts and exemptions are available and these are mainly based on the condition of the property and the people living at the property.
  2. Council tax is not based on the number of council services a person benefits from. So, the Council was not at fault for telling Mrs B it cannot reduce her council tax for this reason.
  3. The Council has now responded to Mrs B’s query about how she can ask the Council to adopt the road and the process involved. So, further involvement by the Ombudsman is not justified.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings