South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 003 096)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s use of discretion to write off a debt as the matter was appealed to a Valuation Tribunal and remedied by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council failed to immediately use its discretionary powers to write off a Council tax debt which forced her to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal and the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that he asked the Council to write off an overpayment of Council tax following a bereavement. The Council initially refused to exercise its discretion to do this and so she appealed to a Valuation Tribunal.
  2. The Council then wrote off the debt following their complaints procedure.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot investigate a complaint where the matter has been appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. Notwithstanding this, the Council has properly remedied the complaint by writing off the debt.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she appealed to a Valuation Tribunal and the matter has been remedied.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings