London Borough of Lambeth (24 002 469)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint the Council wrongly pursued Mrs X for unpaid council tax. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. The Council has written off any court costs and any outstanding amount. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. 

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council wrongly pursued her for council tax on a property she rented out. She said the Council sent reminders about the unpaid council tax to that property, instead of her home address. She said she then received a letter from the Council threatening bailiff actions, because of a significant outstanding debt. She said that letter caused her significant distress. She wants the Council to pay her compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s complaint response states that after Mrs X contacted it about the council tax arrears, it contacted her tenants to set up payment of the council tax and wrote off any court costs that had arisen. It initially continued to charge her for five days of council tax it assessed her as liable for, before writing off that amount. The Council also apologised for writing to Mrs X at the tenanted property, instead of her home address. It explained how that error had happened.
  2. As the Council has fully investigated the complaint; taken corrective action and apologised for using the incorrect address, we will not investigate this complaint. That is because further investigation will not lead to a different outcome. There is not significant outstanding injustice that justifies us investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings