Pendle Borough Council (23 020 625)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the council tax arrears the Council is holding Mrs X responsible for. This is because she has right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has miscalculated her partner’s income and calculated her council tax arrears incorrectly. She also complains the Council delayed responding to her MP when he contacted it on her behalf.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about council tax arrears on her account because she said she was not liable for amounts quoted. She also complained that the Council delayed responding when her MP contacted it on her behalf.
  2. The Council advised the arrears were created by changes in her partner’s income. The Council acknowledged it delayed responding to her MP and apologised for this but confirmed it had continued to contact her to discuss the matter. The Council removed approximately £80 from the council tax arrears as a goodwill gesture but would not agree to waive the remaining balance. Mrs X then brought her complaint to us.
  3. It is not the Ombudsman’s role to determine whether Mrs X is liable to pay the council tax arrears the Council is holding her responsible for; this is the role of the Valuation Tribunal. It would therefore be reasonable for Mrs X to refer this part of her complaint to the Tribunal.
  4. The evidence shows the Council significantly delayed responding to Mrs X’s MP after he contacted it regarding the arrears. Whilst this no doubt caused Mrs X frustration, there is no evidence this made a difference to what happened or caused Mrs X a significant injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings