Salford City Council (23 020 472)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s policy on empty home council tax charges. This is because we cannot criticise the Council’s policy or achieve the outcome the complainant seeks.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to levy a premium council tax charge on his property for a period when it was empty. Mr X says he was carrying out work at the property to prepare it for occupation after buying it and feels the charge is unfair. Mr X wants the Council to waive the charge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Under the Local Government Finance Act 2012, the Council is entitled to adopt a policy to charge a council tax premium on empty homes. While I recognise Mr X feels the policy is unfair, we cannot criticise the policy or ask the Council to waive the charge.
  2. If Mr X considers the Council’s decision on the charge is wrong then he can appeal against it to the Valuation Tribunal, the independent body that determines such matters.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot criticise the Council’s policy or achieve the outcome he seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings