London Borough of Croydon (23 014 034)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about misinformation by the Council as there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal. Further, part of the complaint is out of time.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that she was told, incorrectly, in 2022 that she could not make a request for discretionary funding to write off Council tax arrears.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council in 2022 about delay in determining her Council tax support from December 2021. The Council apologised for the delay but advised that the (then) current arrears could not be written off as compensation.
  2. Ms X then complained in 2023 that she was not advised that she could apply for a discretionary payment which would have written off the arrears.
  3. The complaint made in 2022 about delay is out of time for investigation by the Ombudsman as it could have been made to this office within 12 months of becoming aware of the delay.
  4. I have therefore considered whether the failure to advise about the right to ask for a discretionary payment is fault. The Council says that any request for a discretionary payment in 2022 for arrears which occurred in 2021 would have been refused as it related to an earlier Council tax year. This is the Council’s policy. However, any decision made by a Council regarding a discretionary decision can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent, expert body whose decisions are binding on the Council. I therefore consider that it would be reasonable to pursue an appeal in this case.
  5. The question of whether the Council should have compensated Ms X for the original delay is out of time. The remedy for incorrect advice is to make a request now and appeal any negative decision to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because part of the complaint is out of time and the recent complaint could be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings