Sheffield City Council (23 012 975)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Dec 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to response to Mr X’s attempts to contact it regarding a summons. This is because an investigation would not provide Mr X with a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council did not respond to multiple calls and emails he sent regarding an upcoming summons hearing to dispute council tax liability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council after he missed a court hearing to dispute council tax liability. Mr X said he attempted to contact the Council 29 times and did not receive a response.
  2. The Council investigated and conceded it was at fault for failing to respond to Mr X and it would take action to ensure the issue did not happen again. The Council apologised and explained that it would remove the liability order and summons costs to address the injustice Mr X experienced.
  3. Mr X remains unhappy with the Council’s actions and wants us to find the Council at fault. The Ombudsman’s primary purpose is to put things right. The evidence shows the Council has acknowledged that it was at fault, apologise and provided a proportionate financial remedy. These were reasonable actions for the Council to take and in line with the Ombudsman’s approach.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings