London Borough of Croydon (23 000 809)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax and housing benefit arrears. Both decisions were appealable via tribunal and there is not a good reason for the Ombudsman to consider the complaint instead.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs X complained the Council pursued them for council tax and housing benefit overpayment for a property that was uninhabitable due to fire damage. They say the matter has caused significant stress and time and trouble, and they want the Council to accept the property was not fit for habitation and waive the arrears.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr and Mrs X say their property suffered a fire in 2020, however the Council began pursuing them for council tax and housing benefit overpayments for the period during which it was uninhabitable.
  2. Mr and Mrs X say they appealed the housing benefit overpayment decision via a tribunal and through this process it was agreed the property had been uninhabitable. However they say the council tax department have continued to claim the property was habitable, which contradicts this. They say the Council is abusing its position and bullying them.
  3. Both decisions carry appeal rights. It was reasonable for Mr and Mrs X to also appeal the council tax decision, as they did with the housing benefit decision. The tribunal is an independent body whose decisions are binding on the Council. We cannot decide whether council tax is payable, or whether a property is fit for habitation. There is not a good reason for us to consider this complaint instead.
  4. In any event, the complaint is also now late as it is about a matter Mr and Mrs X knew about in 2020 and there is not a good reason for the delay in complaining to us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr and Mrs’s complaint because they had the right to appeal the Council’s decisions via tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings