North Somerset Council (23 000 599)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an overpayment of council tax as we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant asks for and there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains she was forced to pay council tax and enforcement agent fees for a period she says she was not liable for. Ms X seeks a refund of the money she paid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its stage two complaint response, the Council sets out the billing and recovery action it took in respect of the debt in question and says as the action was valid, no refund will be paid.
  2. I have checked the Council's recovery policy and it appears to have acted in accordance with this. As such, there is insufficient evidence of fault by the council in taking recovery action, to warrant our further involvement. In addition, we are not able to determine if the council wrongly held Ms X responsible for council tax for the period in question. The Valuation Tribunal (VT) is the independent body which can determine liability and it was open to Ms X to appeal against the Council's decision on her liability, to it. It is reasonable to expect Ms X have done this and we are not empowered to ask the Council to refund disputed council tax paid.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the disputed liability could have been addressed via an appeal to the VT and there is insufficient evidence of fault in respect of recovery action taken by the Council to warrant our involvement

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings