Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (22 011 552)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the complainant’s council tax is wrong. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Ms X, complains her council tax is wrong. She says the Council owes her £66 and she did not receive the covid hardship payments. Ms X also says the Council owes her £1.40 in postage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence, council tax support (CTS) letters and council tax bills. I also considered our Assessment Code and comments Ms X made in reply to a draft of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says her council tax is wrong and she is owed £66. She has referred to not getting covid hardship payments or a CTS payment. Ms X wants the £66 and interest and a refund of postage costs.
  2. In response to her complaint the Council provided statements, demonstrated that she has received the hardship payments and said it had written off arrears of £81. It also explained it awarded backdated CTS of £66. Ms X says the arrears write off was £84 not £81.
  3. I have considered all the statements, letters and the points made by Ms X and I cannot see anything wrong or any need to start an investigation. There are many documents showing the hardship payments were made and there is a letter confirming Ms X was awarded backdated CTS. I have checked the liability, hardship payments and the backdated CTS and checked that against the amount paid by Ms X; there is a zero balance showing Ms X is not owed £66 as she asserts and we will not start an investigation over disputed postal costs.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings