London Borough of Croydon (22 006 281)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about recovery action taken by the Council for council tax arrears as there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about recovery action the Council took when he could not keep up with his council tax payments due to unemployment. Mr X feels this is unfair as he says he had problems making payments via the Council’s website and was unbale to speak to anyone about his case over the telephone. Mr X seeks a refund of the enforcement fees he has paid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. While I recognise Mr X had issues making payments and making contact over the telephone, the Council was within its rights to take the enforcement action that it did. From the information I have seen, it sent the necessary reminders and notices to Mr X in order to start recovery action. It has explained that costs that were added to Mr X’s account were for the summons that was issued, and enforcement fees. The enforcement fees levied were standard fees that are set out in law.
  2. As I have not seen indication of fault by the Council, there are not grounds for us to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council in respect of the recovery action it took.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings