London Borough of Ealing (22 000 974)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled the collection of council tax. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault and because the matter is subject to the start of court proceedings.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains that he has been issued with a court summons for unpaid council tax, without first being issued with a demand in the post.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains that the Council failed to send him a demand for council tax in the post, prior to issuing him with a court summons. The Council’s says its records shows that Mr X signed up for paperless billing, prior to the demand being sent to him, and that the demand was subsequently sent by email. I will not investigate this complaint because there it is unlikely we would find fault. The Council say the demand was sent by email, and Mr X has confirmed that he has a copy. If someone signs up for paperless billing, we would not expect the Council to also send a paper copy of a demand.
  2. We cannot investigate the Council’s decision to issue a summons for recovery of the council tax debt. This is because we cannot investigate the start of court proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault and we cannot investigate the start of court proceedings.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings