London Borough of Hounslow (21 013 442)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax liability and council tax support. It would be reasonable for the complainant to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal. We will also not investigate parts of the complaint about fraud and the Council causing him to lose his business. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr Z says the Council failed to apply council tax support to his bill over the years dating back to 2007. As a result, he says the Council has sent enforcement agents to recover the Council tax which he cannot afford and is not liable for.
  2. Mr X also says the Council has committed serious fraud and has caused him to lose his business.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
  4. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Z and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Z’s complaint relates to the Council’s decisions not to provide Council tax support and his subsequent council tax liability.
  2. Mr Z has the right to appeal against this at the Valuation Tribunal.
  3. The Valuation Tribunal is a free and easy to use service which deals with council tax liability and council tax support disputes.
  4. Therefore, it would be reasonable for Mr Z to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.
  5. The Council also says it has asked Mr Z to provide more information about his allegations regarding fraud and the Council causing him to lose his business. However, he failed to do that, so there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Z’s complaint because it would be reasonable for him to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he disputes his council tax liability. There is also not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation into vague allegations of fraud and corruption.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings