Birmingham City Council (21 008 054)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability. It would be reasonable for the complainant to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, to whom I refer here as Mr X says the Council was at fault when charging Council tax from him for the ground floor of his property. This part of the property is leased to a tenant who should be held liable for the Council tax payments. Mr X was convinced that the Council tax payments he made were in fact business rates for the first floor of the property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. There has been an ongoing dispute regarding Mr X’s liability for Council tax for the part of his property.
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on Council tax liability and Council tax support or reduction.
  3. Any dispute about liability for Council tax can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an expert body and their decisions are binding on the Council. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case.
  4. In cases where we do not investigate the matters in a complaint, we do not separately investigate the Council’s complaint handling process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it would be reasonable to expect Mr X to complain to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings