Torbay Council (19 019 773)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint about the Council’s decision to hold her liable for council tax. This is because if Ms B disagreed with the Council’s decision it was reasonable for her to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms B is unhappy the Council is holding her liable for council tax for the period when her house was empty and owned by someone else before she bought it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Ms B. I shared a draft of this decision with Ms B and invited her comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Council wrote to Ms B and said she owed £595.14 of council tax because of a two-year empty property premium.
  2. Ms B disputes this and says she shouldn’t have to pay for a property that was empty and owned by someone else.
  3. In its response to Ms B’s query, the Council explained it applies a levy of 100% on properties that have been unoccupied and unfurnished for two years or more. The Council also referred Ms B to the Valuation Tribunal if she disagreed with its decision.
  4. When someone has a right of appeal to a tribunal, the Ombudsman normally expects them to use that right, unless it is unreasonable for them to do so. Any dispute about council tax liability or entitlement to council tax support can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The Tribunal is an independent expert body. I see no reason why Ms B could not have appealed to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint. This is because if Ms B disagreed with the Council’s decision it was reasonable for her to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings