Council tax support


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Manchester City Council (25 011 918)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 06-Feb-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his mother’s council tax support claim and its response to his recent complaint. Ms X has already appealed to the Valuation Tribunal and we have previously considered a complaint about the Council’s handling of the matter. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures alone.

  • London Borough of Bromley (25 009 747)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 05-Feb-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Housing Benefit overpayment decision and council tax discount. This is because he has already appealed to a tribunal about the overpayment, and he can appeal to the Valuation Tribunal about the council tax discount. There is also not enough evidence of fault or significant injustice to warrant investigating the remaining matters separately.

  • Sunderland City Council (25 010 899)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 03-Feb-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council handled errors in calculating council tax support. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an Ombudsman investigation.

  • Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (25 019 162)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 28-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax support because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • North Yorkshire Council (25 018 952)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 27-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax reduction delay because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation. He also has a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • Bristol City Council (24 021 347)

    Statement Upheld Council tax support 14-Jan-2026

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council delayed considering her application for council tax reduction. She also complained about the Council’s complaint handling. Mrs X said this distressed her and she may be paying more for her council tax. Based on current evidence we are minded to find there was fault in the way the Council did not communicate the decision, and its complaint handling was poor. This frustrated Ms X, and she was put to time and trouble to complain. The Council agreed to apologise, make a financial payment and issue guidance to its staff.

  • Trafford Council (25 011 617)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 14-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr X’s council tax account. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

  • Trafford Council (25 010 327)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 13-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decisions on the payment of council tax support, single person discount and the liability for council tax payments. It was reasonable for Ms X to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal to challenge these decisions.

  • London Borough of Croydon (25 011 066)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 07-Jan-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council considered her applications for council tax support. This is because it is reasonable to expect Ms X to use her right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (25 021 078)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax support 18-Dec-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint the Council failed to communicate with her about her application for council tax reduction. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate where the substantive matter is outside our jurisdiction.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings