North Yorkshire Council (25 018 952)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax reduction delay because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation. He also has a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council delayed notifying him that his savings meant that no Council tax reduction was applicable.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement..

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that he supplied the Council with bank statements on 30 May 2025 in support of his Council tax reduction application. He says that the Council told him on 17 July that his savings were too high for a Council tax reduction to be paid. His existing Council tax reduction was cancelled and backdated to 8 April.
  2. He says that the rules are confusing and the delay caused him stress and upset. He made a request for a discretionary Council tax reduction.
  3. Any dispute about entitlement to Council tax reduction or a discretionary payment can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.
  4. I appreciate that the delay in notifying him of the decision to cancel his Council tax reduction caused him upset. The decision would have affected his budgeting, but, as he had savings for this relatively short period, I am not persuaded that any financial compensation is appropriate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council injustice to warrant investigation and there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings