Manchester City Council (23 019 910)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s response to his information requests. This is because it is reasonable for Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not provided him with the information he asked for.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner. 
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X raised a Freedom of Information (FOI) request with the Council in October 2023 asking how many times the Council had challenged information provided by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). The Council explained it does not hold this information and therefore could not share it with him.
  2. Mr X asked the Council to complete an internal review of their response. The Council found Mr X’s request was dealt with correctly.
  3. I will not investigate this complaint because Mr X can refer his concerns to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). They are better placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is better dealt with by the ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings