London Borough of Hillingdon (19 012 712)
Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 17 Dec 2019
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his request for Council Tax Support. This is because the complaint is late, and it was reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the tribunal.
The complaint
- Mr X says he has been waiting over two years for the Council to agree his application for Council Tax Support.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
- The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered Mr X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information he provided. I also gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on his complaint.
What I found
- Mr X says he has been waiting over two years for the Council to award him Council Tax Support. Mr X says the Council has started recovery action for outstanding council tax. The Council has responded to a complaint from Mr X and has explained he was entitled to Council Tax Support between May 2017 and March 2018 – but only £0.08 per week. It has said that if Mr X disagreed with the Council’s decision, he had the right to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.
- The Ombudsman normally expects people to complain to us within twelve months of them becoming aware of a problem. We look at each complaint individually, and on its merits, considering the circumstances of each case. But we do not exercise discretion to accept a late complaint unless there are clear and compelling reasons to do so. I do not consider that to be the case here. I see no reason Mr X could not have complained much earlier, and so the exception at paragraph 2 applies to his complaint. In reaching this decision I have taken into account the points I make below.
- Any decision about entitlement to Council Tax Support is appealable to a Valuation Tribunal. The Tribunal is an independent, expert body, set up by Parliament as a way for the public to challenge decisions about council tax. When there is a right to appeal to a tribunal, the Ombudsman normally expects people to use this right. I see no reason why an appeal could not have been made to the Tribunal, and so an investigation by the Ombudsman is not appropriate.
Final decision
- The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because the complaint is late, and it was reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the tribunal.
Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman