Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 50691 results

  • Bedford Borough Council (24 004 830)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complains that the Council unfairly rejected her tender for an event. There is no evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision to award the contract to another company. The Council is at fault as it delayed in notifying Mrs X of the outcome of the tender exercise which caused uncertainty to her. The Council has appropriately remedied this injustice by apologising to Mrs X.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 005 028)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Leicestershire County Council (24 005 589)

    Statement Not upheld Charging 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: There is no fault by the Council in its financial assessment for Ms X’s care and support. The Council applied charging rules when carrying out the assessment and any delay was due to Mr X not providing information the Council required. We are satisfied the Council provided general information about charging at the time care and support started.

  • West Sussex County Council (24 007 258)

    Statement Not upheld Other 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained about a decision to refuse to class his daughter Ms D’s course as free aftercare under the Mental Health Act 1983. The Ombudsmen did not uphold the complaint. We found no fault in the actions of West Sussex County Council and NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board.

  • NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board (24 007 258a)

    Statement Not upheld Mental health services 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained about a decision to refuse to class his daughter Ms D’s course as free aftercare under the Mental Health Act 1983. The Ombudsmen did not uphold the complaint. We found no fault in the actions of West Sussex County Council and NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board.

  • Devon County Council (24 012 759)

    Statement Upheld School transport 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse to provide her children with separate school transport from home to school. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 012 939)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a failure to act on breaches of planning control. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council came to the decisions not to take enforcement action. We cannot require the Council to make the landowner remove the containers on the site or cease using the site for business purposes. Finally, the Council has apologised for the delay in telling Ms X of the outcome of its consideration of her reports of breaches of planning control. We consider further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 012 968)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a safeguarding referral as there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (24 013 006)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decisions concerning the safeguarding of her child. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant our further involvement.

  • Essex County Council (24 013 338)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Alternative provision 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to make alternative educational provision for the complainant’s son. This is because there is no evidence of fault on the Council’s part.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings