Royal Borough of Greenwich (19 002 607)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jul 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council’s safeguarding team. This is because the complaint is made late, and there are no good reasons to exercise the Ombudsman’s discretion to consider it now. Other complaints made by the complainant relate to her medical care, and are out of the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Miss K, says that:
    • The actions of the Council’s safeguarding teams between 2005-8 caused the PA to lose her job; and
    • Medical treatment that she has received is intrusive and causes her difficulties.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as Health Trusts. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Miss K, and I sent her an initial view for her comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss K says that the actions of the Council’s safeguarding teams between 2005 -2008 caused her difficulties, and ultimately resulted in the loss of her employment as a teacher. She has not been able to work since then, and believes the Council is responsible for this situation.
  2. Miss K has complained to the Ombudsman, but we will not investigate this matter. This is because the LGSCO cannot consider complaints about issues that the complainant knew about more than 12 months previously, unless there are good reasons to exercise the Ombudsman’s discretion to set aside the time bar. In this case, there are no good reasons to investigate these events from so far in the past.
  3. Miss K has also complained about medical treatments that she has received, both now and in the past, but we cannot investigate these complaints. This is because complaints about Health Trusts need to be made to the Parliamentary and Health Care Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint as it is made late and there is no good reason to investigate it now. Other complaints about health care are out of the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.

Investigator’s final decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings