City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (25 015 734)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the care commissioned by the Council and provided by a care home to her late mother Mrs Y, the home’s communication with family and how it dealt with her complaint. An investigation could not achieve a worthwhile outcome, nor make findings regarding Mrs Y’s cause of death. We do not investigate internal complaint-handling where we are not investigating the core issues giving rise to the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X is the late Mrs Y’s daughter. Mrs Y moved to a different care home when her previous home closed. She was there three weeks just before she died. Mrs Y’s placement was commissioned and partly funded by the Council. Mrs X complains:
      1. the home neglected Mrs Y’s basic care needs, including her food and fluid intake;
      2. home staff did not tell the family about Mrs Y’s weight loss and her food and fluid intake;
      3. the care home’s responses did not acknowledge the severity of the complaint or take responsibility.
  2. Mrs X considers the home’s lack of care caused Mrs Y’s death. She says the matter has caused great sadness, distress and frustration to Mrs Y’s family. Mrs X says the family could have done more if they had known more about Mrs Y’s situation, which they regret.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Mrs X, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The care home responded to Mrs X’s complaint. The replies recognised there had been errors in its records and processes in regard to Mrs Y’s food and fluid intake. But the home did not consider Mrs Y died due to the care it provided.
  2. We recognise Mrs X and Mrs Y’s family have been caused some upset and distress by the issues raised regarding Mrs Y’s care, in addition to that which would be caused by the loss of a family member. But the injustice of any fault in that care was primarily to Mrs Y. We cannot provide a remedy to Mrs Y as she has died, so there would be no worthwhile outcome an investigation by us would now achieve for her. We will not investigate where an investigation cannot provide a remedy because the person who would have been affected has died. We understand Mrs X’s and her family’s injustice also involves feelings of remorse from not taking more action while Mrs Y was at the care home. But we could not say the outcome for Mrs Y or her family would have been different if the home had given them more information about her condition, over and above what family members saw during their visits to her. An investigation by us could also not remove the family members’ feelings of regret, so would not achieve a worthwhile outcome for them.
  3. We further note Mrs X considers the care provision Mrs Y received was the cause of her death and was dissatisfied with the care home’s responses not accepting that responsibility. But an investigation by us could not make such a finding. There was a safeguarding investigation into the matter as well as police involvement, who did not take the case further. An investigation by us could not change or overturn the causes of Mrs Y’s death as recorded on the death certificate. That we cannot achieve this finding as an outcome is a further reason why we will not investigate.
  4. Mrs X also complains the care home’s responses did not reflect the seriousness of the matter. We do not investigate a body’s complaint handling in isolation where we are not investigating the core issues which gave rise to the complaint. It is not a good use of our resources to do so. That limitation applies here so we will not investigate this aspect of the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because:
    • an investigation by us could not achieve a worthwhile outcome; and
    • we do not investigate complaint-handling where we are not investigating the core issues giving rise to the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings