Surrey County Council (25 005 762)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about hearing aids going missing in a care home. It is unlikely we could achieve anything worthwhile or achieve the outcome requested as missing personal possessions are matters for insurers or the police.

The complaint

  1. In short, Mrs X complains about her relative’s hearing aids going missing in their care home. Mrs X wants the care home to replace the hearing aids.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. It is unlikely the Ombudsman would achieve anything worthwhile by investigating what happened to the hearing aids. The care home has advised Mrs X that it carried a full search of her relative’s room, interviewed staff on duty and reported the matter to the Police.
  1. Mrs X is understandably aggrieved that her relative has been left without any hearing aids. However the Ombudsman’s role is to consider complaints about administrative failure and we do not investigate missing items and financial loss incurred. These are matters for insurers, the courts or the Police. It is unlikely the Ombudsman could link the missing hearing aids to fault by the Council, or the Care Provider on its behalf.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would achieve a meaningful outcome or achieve the outcome requested.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings