H.A.S. Careplus Limited (24 020 177)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Care Provider gave her relative, Mr Y’s belongings to a person who was not his next of kin, after his death. It is unlikely an investigation would lead to a different outcome or achieve anything more.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Care Provider wrongly gave her relative, Mr Y’s belongings to another person who was not his next of kin, after his death.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response, the Care Provider explained how the incident had occurred. It acknowledged Ms X was Mr Y’s next of kin, but said the person who collected Mr Y’s belongings was a regular visitor and had told its staff that they were collecting the belongings on Ms X’s behalf. It had offered to contact the person to request they return the belongings, but Ms X had declined this offer. It explained the actions it had taken since her complaint to improve its procedures and to prevent a similar incident happening in future.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint as it is unlikely we could add to the Care Provider’s investigation. Although I accept the matter is likely to have caused Ms X distress, the Care Provider has explained how the incident occurred, acted to learn from Ms X’s complaint and improve its procedures moving forward. An investigation by us would be unlikely to achieve anything more or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation could add to the Care Provider’s investigation or achieve anything more.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings