Oak Lodge Care Ltd (23 006 517)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Care Provider refusing to refund care fees. The complaint is late, and there is not a good reason for us to exercise discretion to investigate it.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Care Provider’s refusal to refund care fees when her brother (Mr Y) began receiving Continuing Healthcare funding. She says the matter has left her brother’s estate out of pocket by several thousand pounds.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says she became aware in April 2022 her brother was due a refund of care fees from the Care Provider, as he began receiving Continuing Healthcare funding. Miss X complained to the Care Provider after a refund was not forthcoming. She received its final response in August 2022, in which it said it would only be able to issue a refund to Mr Y’s own account. However, Mr Y had died and Miss X had already closed his bank account.
  2. Miss X says she instructed a solicitor to correspond further with the Care Provider, but this did not result in a refund of the fees.
  3. The law says people must bring complaints to us within 12 months of becoming aware of the matter. The 12 month timescale in this case begins in April 2022. I have considered Miss X’s view we should apply the timescale from August 2022. However, she knew in April 2022 a refund was due, and it is from that date, not the date of the final complaint response, that we must consider the 12 months from. There is not a good reason for the further 11 month delay after receiving the final response, and Miss X could have contacted us in August 2022.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s late complaint because there is not a good reason for the delay in her bringing the complaint to us.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings