Hartwood Care (3) Limited (22 012 248)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 20 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the care Mr X’s mother Mrs Y received because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome. We have upheld Mr X’s complaint regarding the delay because the Care Provider has accepted fault and provided its staff with training to ensure the matter does not reoccur. The Care Provider has also agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a £250 financial award for the injustice caused to Mr X.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Care Provider did not properly care for his mother, Mrs Y and failed to properly communicate with him. He said this matter caused him stress and inconvenience.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Care Provider.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X made numerous complaints to the Care Provider regarding the standard of care his mother, Ms Y received at its care home. He also complained about the poor communication he received from the Care Provider.
  2. The Care Provider agreed Ms Y’s care had fallen short of its usual standard. In response, the Care Provider arranged training for its staff and appointed an employee to communicate with Mr X regarding Ms Y’s wellbeing. The Care Provider also confirmed it did not increase its annual fees in light of Ms Y’s experience.
  3. Mr X remains unhappy and wants the Ombudsman to find the Care Provider at fault for the shortfalls in service he and Mrs Y experienced. The Care Provider has accepted it is at fault and made service improvements. The Care Provider has also agreed to provide a £250 financial award to address the injustice experienced. An investigation would not lead to a different outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings