Rutland County Council (22 006 318)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the care provided to Ms X’s mother by her care provider. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the care provided by her mother’s care provider. She complains the end-of-life care provided was inadequate. She also complains about the outcome of safeguarding enquiries and delays.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X raised safeguarding concerns about her mother’s care provider. The Council commissioned this care provider. The care provider is in a different Council’s area, Council B.
  2. Although the Council is responsible for addressing Ms X’s complaints about the quality of the care provided by the provider it commissioned, these complaints were addressed in Council B’s safeguarding enquiries. We have considered Ms X’s complaints about Council B’s safeguarding enquiries under a separate complaint.
  3. The Council confirmed Ms X had not raised a complaint and it had not considered the quality of the care provided by the care provider. Therefore, the complaint is premature as we will not investigate until the Council has had the opportunity to respond to a complaint.
  4. However, we do not consider it is proportionate to ask the Council to now investigate the complaint. This is because the Council was aware Council B would be completing safeguarding enquiries and that as part of this, would consider the care provided. It is unlikely a separate investigation by the Council would have led to different findings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings