Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Saima Raja AKA Braemar Care Centre (21 018 066)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 11 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Care Provider refusing to issue a refund. This is because the Care Provider has now issued the refund. This remedies the claimed injustice and an investigation could not achieve anything more.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complained the Care Provider refused to refund fees paid in advance for his mother’s care. Mr X’s mother left the care home at short notice due to a lack of staff. Mr X has also raised concerns about the care provided. Mr X wants the Care Provider to refund £600.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Care Provider.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Care Provider has agreed to the refund. This was Mr X’s desired outcome and an investigation could not achieve anything more.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page