Sunrise Care Homes Limited (21 011 750)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Care Provider’s refusal to share information with Mr X about his father. This is because the Information Commissioners Office would be best placed to consider Mr X’s complaint and we cannot achieve the outcome he is looking for.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains he was refused all information he requested from the Care Provider regarding his father Mr Y, which has caused him distress. Mr X would like the Care Provider to share the information with him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
    • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
    • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner (ICO) if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains he was refused all information he requested from the Care Provider regarding his father, Mr Y. Mr X says:
    • he was not aware who put his father into the care home;
    • Mr Y was cremated which is against his religious beliefs;
    • no autopsy was undertaken and Mr Y was not taken to hospital.
  2. Mr X also says he has additional concerns as Mr Y had strokes but he was not given a second opinion as the Care Provider used their own private doctor.
  3. The Care Provider say they cannot give the information Mr X has requested.
  4. The ICO is the body set up in law to investigate complaints about data protection issues, including the release of information about people who are deceased. The ICO is best placed to deal with the issues Mr X has raised and could achieve the outcome he is seeking in making the Care Provider release the information if it finds it has been withheld without good cause.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the Information Commissioners Office would be better placed to consider Mr X’s complaints and we cannot achieve the outcome he is looking for.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings