Chandos Lodge Limited (20 004 331)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 04 Nov 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The actions of the care provide caused some injustice to Mr X but the care provider has since remedied that by its payment. The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint now as there is no further worthwhile outcome which can be achieved.

The complaint

  1. Mr X (as I shall call the complainant) complained the care provider lost his late mother’s engagement and wedding rings after removing them for safekeeping.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers and decide whether their actions have caused an injustice, or could have caused injustice, to the person making the complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B and 34C)
  2. If an adult social care provider’s actions have caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34H(4))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

I considered the written information provided by Mr X and the care provider. I spoke to Mr X.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X’s late mother Mrs A was resident in the care home.
  2. Mrs A began to lose weight. Two nurses told Mr X they had removed Mrs A’s wedding and engagement rings as they were concerned they would slip off her fingers and be lost. They explained the rings had been put in an envelope in the safe by the home’s administrator.
  3. After Mrs A’s death, Mr X asked at the home about his mother’s rings but they could not be found.
  4. Mr X complained to the home in October 2019. In June 2020 he made a second written complaint and received an acknowledgement that his complaint would be considered. After several more reminders from Mr X, the care provider wrote to him in September 2020. The care provider said the home had a policy that items of significant monetary or sentimental value should not be brought into the home and the home took no responsibility for them. The care provider offered £500 however as a gesture of goodwill.
  5. Mr X did not accept the offer. He complained to the Ombudsman.
  6. In September 2020 the care provider made an improved offer of £800 to Mr X, which Mr X accepted.

Analysis

  1. The care provider took too long to respond to Mr X’s complaint.
  2. As Mr X has now accepted the improved offer from the care provider, there is no worthwhile further involvement from the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The care provider’s actions caused injustice to Mr X which has been remedied by its subsequent payment.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings