London Borough of Ealing (25 014 440)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 09 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about replacing adult social care equipment. The Council failed to deal with the request until the Ombudsman’s involvement. But we are satisfied with the actions it is now taking to arrange the equipment, which is what the complainant wanted.

The complaint

  1. Mr B says the Council failed to provide sought equipment. The Council focused on communication failures and did not resolve the issue Mr B made contact about. Mr B wants equipment replaced as says the equipment is unsafe.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We may investigate a complaint on behalf of someone who has died or who cannot authorise someone to act for them. The complaint may be made by:
  • their personal representative (if they have one), or
  • someone we consider to be suitable.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(2) and 34C(2), as amended)

  1. We accept Mr B as a suitable representative for his relative who uses the Council’s adult social care services.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  3. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Following an Ombudsman enquiry the Council has now contacted Mr B to arrange the replacement equipment. This provides Mr B with the outcome he sought.
  2. I appreciate it will have been frustrating for Mr B to have waited a long time, and to have had the time and trouble of complaining. But, I do not consider there is a significant enough injustice to justify our further involvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we are satisfied with the action the Council is now taking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings