London Borough of Ealing (24 021 128)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council responded to her communication. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council failed to respond to her emails, ignored her requests for information and had not made reasonable adjustments for her. She said the Council is discriminating against her based on her disability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X emailed the Council in July 2024 asking for an email address for the complaints team. She said she needed the email address as a reasonable adjustment. She did not receive a response so made a complaint the following month.
  2. The Council responded to that complaint in August 2024. It said it had passed her email to the social work team that she was known too. It accepted it had not sent her an acknowledgement it had done this. It understood the social work team had contacted her. It said there was no intention to discriminate against her or prevent her from accessing the complaint process.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Although there was a delay in the relevant team responding to Ms X, the Council did process Ms X’s email request. Ms X has made additional complaints to the Council about the conduct of a Social Worker and the Council has responded to this communication. Therefore, there is nothing to suggest it has not made reasonable adjustments for her. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
  4. Ms X also made a subject access request to the Council. Any complaints about how the Council dealt with that would be a matter for the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings