London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 019 692)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council organised supported living for Mr X. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council forced him to live in supported accommodation against his wishes. He said he is unable to work or socialise because of his living situation. He wants to move back to his parents’ house.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council evidenced that Mr X accepted its offer of supported accommodation in an email after his mother said he could no longer live with her. The Council explained to Mr X that he is not forced to live in supported accommodation and can leave at any time. The Council said if Mr X decided to leave the supported accommodation, he would be homeless, and added to the Housing Waiting List.
  2. The Council said Mr X has been supported with making his own decisions about his accommodation with support from his Social Worker, advocate and family.
  3. The Council has clearly communicated with Mr X regarding his housing options and supported him with making his own choices. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings